We hand the candidate real code, already reviewed by an AI whose review is deliberately imperfect. Their mission: to arbitrate — where the AI is right, where it hallucinates, what it missed.
Today, AI writes the code. Your tests still grade the ability to write it by hand. The result: a take-home solved by an AI in eight minutes, a growing share of candidates leaning on AI during the test, and hiring decisions made on a signal the machine falsifies.
The candidate gets real code, already reviewed by an AI whose review is deliberately imperfect — findings that are valid, incomplete or hallucinated, and others deliberately omitted. Their mission: arbitrate each finding, then add their own off-list discoveries.
Each AI finding: valid, incomplete or hallucinated? The candidate decides, justifies, and recovers what the AI missed.
They first form their own judgment, time-boxed, before seeing the AI review. We measure what they see on their own.
Accuracy is scored automatically against the mentor key; the quality of the justification is judged by the Agent.
Human or virtual, the mentor pushes them and checks that their reasoning holds.
Content is generated on demand — every AI review is fresh, up to date, tailored to your stack. Question leaks are structurally over.
Arbitrating the AI review reads on two axes. Together they tell whether the candidate steers the AI — or is steered by it.
Their ability to spot hallucinated findings and recover what the AI missed. The higher it is, the more they think for themselves.
Their tendency to accept a false finding just because the machine states it with confidence. The lower it is, the more they hold their judgment.
The AI review to arbitrate spans the whole technical spectrum and every language — from application code to infrastructure.
A brief, a job description or a résumé. Kodin's AI calibrates a challenge and its review to arbitrate.
They judge blind first, then decide on each AI finding — right, hallucinated, missing — and add off-list discoveries.
Accuracy scored automatically, reasoning judged, adversarial debrief. Scores comparable from one candidate to the next.
Résumé sourcing, session, automated mentor booking and a control cockpit: all in one flow.
Hire and grow teams able to arbitrate AI — not just write code — and secure your decisions with a signal the machine cannot falsify.
Stop burning dozens of hours in interviews. Kodin pre-validates the real skill: judge, arbitrate, direct the code AI produces — not LeetCode.
No timed puzzle, no recitation. We hand you an AI review to arbitrate on real code. We test your judgment, not your memory.
Kodin replaces a stack of tools with a single flow and a signal that resists AI. Gains vary by context.
You no longer decide a hire on a signal the machine falsifies — you decide on the candidate's real judgment.
Assessment platforms test writing — the wrong skill. ATSs orchestrate the flow but assess nothing themselves. Kodin does both, on the skill that matters now: knowing how to arbitrate what an AI produces.
And for Europe: human or virtual mentor as you choose, in-house hosting available, compliance built for the AI Act and the right to a human review — where US players expose you.
Kodin is co-built with a community of early adopters — developers, mentors and pilot companies transforming their hiring. Do you share this collaborative mindset?
Start free, top up as your volumes grow.
We don't ask you to write code: we hand you a deliberately imperfect AI review to arbitrate. The candidate decides on each finding — right, hallucinated, missing — and adds their own. We assess judgment, not speed under pressure.
Yes, structurally: the answer can't be “generated” from a prompt since the task is precisely to judge an AI. Better, Kodin measures the quality of that arbitration. No platform is perfect — we're transparent about that.
Autonomy: can they spot hallucinated findings and recover what the AI missed. Servility: do they get led along when the machine states things with confidence. Together they tell whether they steer the AI or are steered by it.
Yes. The AI review to arbitrate covers all technical roles and every language — not just algorithms.
The decision stays human at every step (human or virtual mentor as you choose), with a right to human review and sovereign in-house hosting. Compliance is built for the European framework.
Create your organization and start with 15 free tokens. Or give us an open role: we’ll show you the difference on a real candidate.